simonh | Answers

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search title only
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Answers
Questions

Good workaround. Thanks. Also works with Category to retrieve list of descriptor values [code:113hi9xz]def descriptorValues = { Matrix matrix, Category category, String descriptorName -> String...

View Question
0 Votes

How does one access the descriptor without using pipe notation? [font=Courier:xnz60ajz]|Matrix1::A1| = matrices['Matrix1].categories.['A1'][/font:xnz60ajz] but what is the equivalent...

View Question
0 Votes

Thanks very much. Referencing the UNlinked category in the select statement was the only permutation that had not occurred to me! Obvious when you know

View Question
0 Votes

Just to add my experience here: I tried to implement an iterative algorithm of a similar nature to the one that Janek describes, and hit the same issue with EnsureCalculated causing unacceptable runtimes....

View Question
0 Votes

Thanks so much Mike. I did try using Select initially but didn't find the magic operator # as applied to a Matrix name. BTW - I don't think the use of the # operator is in the documentation anywhere (not...

View Question
0 Votes

Ben, I'd be happy to provide more input if I can, but I'm not sure quite how I can be more specific than in the previous posts. I found a workaround for the issue of iterating over cells in a matrix...

View Question
0 Votes

I've been working on a situation similar to one shown by Ben here: [quote="Ben G":2pzxh544] ...although Quantrix will let you return a list from a scripted function, it does not generally know...

View Question
0 Votes

Dominik, You don't need to use Java to build a console window (or any other GUI) - you can do it in Groovy. In fact it's somewhat cleaner to do using a static class in Groovy (imho). This approach also...

View Question
0 Votes

Ben, It seems the issue is that the matching is done on the full string. So to match a matrix named "foo bar" you need to use: [font="Courier New"] matrices.find(/foo.*/)[/font] This is equivalent to...

View Question
0 Votes

I know Dominik likes using FOR loops (he's spent too much time writing VB i suspect:)) This construction would I think be closer to what you originally intended (and possibly more in line with what the...

View Question
0 Votes
Load more answers